The HIV Response Is In Danger, The Promise Of Ending AIDS Is Under Threat
Source: Vientiane Times
Last year world leaders came together at the United Nations in New York and agreed a groundbreaking Political Declaration on HIV and AIDS. That plan takes on the inequalities that drive the pandemic by setting ambitious strategies and targets to dramatically reduce new HIV infections, reduce AIDS-related deaths by 2025, and end the AIDS pandemic as a global health threat by 2030 – if world leaders fulfil it.
But the world, including the Lao PDR, are not on track to meeting the targets.
Data just released in the new UNAIDS report, In Danger, reveals that the world is not on course to end AIDS by 2030. The 3.6 percent reduction in global HIV infections in 2021 is the smallest annual fall since 2016. On the current trajectory, there will be a projected 1.2 million new HIV infections worldwide in 2025, more than three times higher than the target of 370 000.
Eastern Europe and central Asia, Middle East and North Africa and Latin America have all seen increases in annual HIV infections over several years. In Asia and the Pacific the world’s most populous region UNAIDS data now shows new HIV infections are rising where they had been falling. Climbing infections in these regions are alarming
The human cost of a stalled HIV response is chilling. Globally, more than 1.5 million people became infected with HIV last year. That’s 4,000 people every day, more than a quarter of them young people aged 15-24.
Women and girls accounted for 49 percent of all new infections in 2021. Worldwide, an adolescent girl or young woman acquires HIV every two minutes. Although affordable treatments are available to prevent most AIDS-related deaths, 650 000 people died of AIDS-related illnesses in 2021.
In the Lao PDR, although the estimated number of new HIV infections are falling and more people are receiving treatment annually, we must go further faster to better protect those most vulnerable to HIV transmission and empower people living with HIV with treatment and other life-saving support.
The concern for overall wellbeing is further underlined by the number of AIDS related deaths and a considerable number of clients lost to treatment follow up. Concerted, holistic, multi-sectoral, and sustainable approaches are needed from all stakeholders in the Laos national HIV response, including leveraging on the valuable and unique support from PLHIV and key population communities and networks
The COVID-19 pandemic, the conflict in Ukraine and the global economic crisis have created extraordinary headwinds that threaten national AIDS responses. Global solidarity is fraying, richer countries are cutting or redeploying humanitarian budgets, low- and middle-income countries are saddled with debt repayment and being forced to cut back spending on essential services like health and education and, in many countries, there is a lack of political will to challenge inequalities, gender-based violence and the criminalization and marginalization of vulnerable groups of people that continue to drive HIV infection levels.
In Laos, the COVID-19 pandemic caused disruptions to HIV prevention, treatment, and care services. However, innovations developed to cope with these disruptions, such as scale up the community-based ART delivery model, multi-month dispensing policies and telehealth services, will serve to bolster inclusive and quality HIV service delivery to those most in need. However, inequalities, stigma, and discrimination remain which result in the most marginalized not accessing HIV-related services.
The human and financial cost of not ending AIDS by 2030 would far outweigh the cost of the immediate and necessary action to turn the ship around.
The good news is that success is possible, and we know how to do it. Examples of these achievements can be found in the Asia and Pacific region, such as the use of digital technologies and community-led services to reach more key populations, especially young people, in the Philippines and Thailand; scale up of HIV testing and reduction of new infections in Vietnam; and scale up of PrEP in Cambodia.
Here are five ways that countries can defend and expand their HIV response.
lAddress the inequalities that stop people receiving HIV prevention, testing and treatment services. In diverse settings, countries and communities are taking action to end inequalities and close gaps. Building on this momentum, policy makers need to strengthen their understanding of localised epidemics to focus on eliminating the inequalities that are slowing progress against the pandemic.
l Realise human rights and gender equality. Punitive, discriminatory, counterproductive laws and policies must be removed. The human rights of women and girls, including their sexual and reproductive rights, must be upheld. Countries must prioritise and integrate focused, well-resourced efforts to end gender-based violence into national HIV responses.
l Make a new push for HIV prevention. Countries urgently need to elevate the political and financial prioritisation of HIV prevention, including providing comprehensive sexuality educations in-and-out of school, and move to large-scale implementation of prevention projects so that innovations such as PrEP and long acting injectables become much more widely accessible, especially to vulnerable groups of people like young women and adolescent girls, gay men and other men who have sex with men, sex workers, people who use drugs and transgender people.
l Support and effectively resource community-led responses. Countries must recognise the essential role of community-led responses and integrate them into national HIV planning, implementation and monitoring. Communities should be effectively resourced and laws that impede community-led responses should be removed.
l Ensure sufficient and sustainable funding. Major new investment and innovative programmatic and financial mechanisms are needed to ensure a fully funded global AIDS response, both from international donors and governments in low- and middle-income countries. Coordinated international action is also required to alleviate the debt crisis facing too many countries and to counteract the need for short-sighted and counterproductive national austerity measures.
In Laos, two key priorities for urgent action are (1) increase efforts and allocations to prevention and treatment interventions (especially for key population groups) and (2) increase investments and allocative efficiencies of the HIV response to deliver high impact interventions. These are critical to build greater momentum in the national HIV response and ensure that nobody is left behind.
Ending AIDS is a promise that can and must be kept.
About the author: Ms Patricia Ongpin is UNAIDS Country Director for Laos, Cambodia, and Malaysia